Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40502438›Full record

ArticlePEC innovation2025

Perceptions of frailty and falls in older adults using an English regional ambulance service: A descriptive phenomenological study.

Karl Charlton, Tripta Rathour, Emma Burrow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PEC innovation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Karl CharltonNorth East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Bernicia House, Newburn Riverside, Newcastle upon Tyne NE15 8NY, UK.
Tripta RathourGateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust, Bensham Hospital, Gateshead, Tyne & Wear NE8 4YL, UK.
Emma BurrowNorth East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Bernicia House, Newburn Riverside, Newcastle upon Tyne NE15 8NY, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Frailty is of increasing importance for healthcare systems as well as the personalised care agenda. Despite the evolving body of research exploring frailty and falls in the ambulance setting, the voices of frail older adults who use ambulance services, are seldom heard. Through first-hand accounts, this study set out to describe the experiences and perceptions of frailty for a cohort of older adults. Methods: A descriptive phenomenological study involving eight participants with frailty who used a regional English National Health Service (NHS) ambulance service following a fall, conducted between July 2022-February 2023. Results: Accounts from older adults highlight different perceptions of frailty and attitudes towards ageing. Frailty and falls were experienced through varying perceptions of identity and self Conclusion: Older adults generally hold negative perceptions of frailty, falls and ageing, but also challenged the negative terms frequently used to describe frailty, suggesting some frail older adults remain positive and still value life. Paramedics are likely to require further training and support to manage patients with frailty effectively and improve patient experience. Innovation: This study uniquely explores frailty and falls through the stories of older adults using an NHS ambulance service. It highlights that older adults in this setting often differ from the older population in general, have a higher frailty prevalence than patients in other settings and appear to view the future with greater pessimism.

Indexed as

AmbulanceFallsFrailtyPhenomenology

Identifiers

PMID40502438
PMCPMC12158518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.