ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Free Flap Salvage Using Extracorporeal Tissue Plasminogen Activator Administration: A Comparative Study.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Flap thrombosis is a challenging complication in free flap surgery, which if untreated will lead to flap failure. Besides mechanical thrombectomy, the potential benefit of thrombolytic therapy with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in flap salvage surgery remains uncertain. We hypothesized that extracorporeal tPA administration combined with surgical revision would lead to fewer flap necroses without increased bleeding complications. Methods: A retrospective study involving 1308 free flaps was conducted, including 42 patients who underwent surgical revision due to established flap thrombosis. The administration of tPA was analyzed in relation to the outcome variables: total and partial flap necrosis, secondary blood transfusion, and exploration for a hematoma or a new thrombosis. Results: Twenty-two patients received tPA during reexploration, and 20 patients did not. In the tPA group, 9 (41%) total flap failures occurred, and 4 (18%) flaps experienced partial flap necrosis. By comparison, in the tPA naive group, there were 4 (20%) total flap failures and 2 (10%) with partial flap necrosis (not significant). No differences were found in terms of the need for blood transfusion, secondary reexploration for bleeding, or a new thrombosis between the tPA and tPA naive groups. Conclusions: We did not find that tPA reduced the risk for flap necrosis, nor did it increase the risk for secondary bleeding-related adverse effects. We believe that there was a selection bias toward more severely compromised flaps receiving tPA. We consider extracorporeally administrated tPA in the flap to be safe and a valuable tool in flap salvage surgery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.