Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40502427›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025

Quantifying Research Productivity From First-year US Integrated Plastic Surgery Residents After USMLE Step I Pass/Fail Conversion.

Andrew Hannoudi, Benjamin A Sarac, Jeffrey E Janis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Expectations and Considerations of Research Fellowships in Plastic Surgery.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
    Article
  3. Implications of the Shifting Landscape of Plastic Surgery Training Paradigms.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew HannoudiFrom the Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI.
Benjamin A SaracDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Jeffrey E JanisDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Matching into integrated plastic surgery residency is extremely competitive. Although previous studies have examined the research output of matched residents, a thorough investigation of their types of publications, authorship trends, and citation metrics has not been performed following the transition of Step 1 to a pass/fail system. Identifying trends among successful matriculants may guide medical students toward successful preparation for the current application process. Methods: Research profiles for 213 first-year US integrated plastic surgery residents from the 2024-2025 cohort were analyzed using Scopus. Variables included publication count, number of first-author publications, types of publications, and journal impact factor. Residents were tiered into quartiles based on the amount of National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding received by their programs' associated universities or hospitals. Univariate regression analysis was performed to determine the relationship between NIH tiers and various research output characteristics. Results: The 2024-2025 integrated plastic surgery residency cohort had a median of 5 publications. First authorship contribution was evident in 32.6% of all publications, and 59.2% of all publications discussed plastic surgery-related topics. Original research articles were 66.4% of the studies. Journals published in had a median impact factor of 2.1. No significant differences were observed between NIH funding tiers and any of the research output characteristic variables. Conclusions: This study may guide future US integrated plastic surgery applicants toward success in the match by offering a qualitative and quantitative overview of the current landscape of research output characteristics for successful matriculants.

Identifiers

PMID40502427
PMCPMC12153281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.