ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
A cross-sectional and longitudinal cohort study of creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio and cardiovascular disease risk in a middle-aged and elderly population.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Serum creatinine to cystatin C ratio and risk of incident digestive diseases in middle-aged and older adults: a prospective national cohort study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Cardiometabolic multimorbidity in relation to the metabolic score for insulin resistance and creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio in a middle-aged and aged population.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio (CCR) has recently been proposed as a proxy indicator for sarcopenia. It has been linked to a range of adverse outcomes. However, the relationship between the CCR and cardiovascular disease (CVD) is not widely recognized. This study used data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study to investigate the association between the CCR and CVD in a middle-aged and elderly population. Methods: The cross-sectional study and longitudinal cohort study included 10,614 and 6,720 passengers, respectively. The occurrence of CVD incidents was defined as self-reported health history or receipt of cardiac disease treatment. The CCR through creatinine (mg/dL) and cystatin C (mg/dL) were calculated and grouped by quartiles. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models were employed to further explore the CCR-CVD relationships. Results: The findings of our study demonstrated a progressively significant reduction in the risk of CVD with an additional CCR. The cross-sectional cohort findings indicated a 21% reduction in the risk of CVD with every additional unit of CCR (OR=0.79, 95% CI, 0.73-0.84). In three logistic regression models, there was a significant association between CCR quartiles and a lower risk of CCR (p for trend <0.001). Further subgroup analyses revealed a 16% reduction in the incidence of CVD with each additional unit of CCR among individuals aged below 65 years (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.78-0.91) and a 18% decline in CVD with each unit of CCR in married populations (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.77-0.88). The findings of the Longitudinal Cohort Study indicated that for each unit increase in CCR, there was an 22% reduction in the risk of CVD (OR=0.78, 95% CI, 0.68-0.90). In logistic regression models adjusted for all co-dependent variables, the prevalence of CVD was reduced by 15%, 21%, and 41% as the number of CCR quartiles increased. This result was also verified by restricted cubic spline analysis. Conclusion: In conclusion, the correlation between an elevated CCR and a reduced risk of CVD in middle-aged and elderly populations has been established. Enhanced CCR levels may prove useful in predicting CVD occurrence in the elderly, thus representing a simple and effective biomarker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.