ArticleJPRAS open2025
Efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy combine with negative pressure wound therapy in chronic wound: A randomized controlled trial.
Article in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gas Therapies for Chronic Wounds: Comparative Effectiveness, Safety, and Evidence Certainty-A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Surgical Wound Healing and Tissue Salvage: A Structured Narrative Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Review
- Exploring Core Genes Involved in Ischemic Stroke and the Therapeutic Potential of Hyperbaric Oxygen: Insights from Transcriptomic Analysis.Neuromolecular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic wounds present a significant challenge, resulting in prolonged care, extended hospital stays, and substantial financial and psychosocial burdens for patients and the healthcare system. Despite various techniques available to accelerate wound healing and reduce hospital stays, no standard approach for chronic wound care has been universally agreed upon. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is well-known, but its effectiveness as a primary treatment is uncertain. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is another adjunctive technique that increases oxygen supply to wounds to promote healing, similar to NPWT. This study evaluates the effectiveness of combining HBOT with NPWT in treating chronic wounds. Methods: This prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial involved patients with chronic wounds requiring NPWT. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either HBOT with NPWT or NPWT alone. The primary objective was to compare wound healing rates, with secondary outcomes including pain scores and bacterial contamination. Results: Each study group included twenty-four patients. The analysis showed a significantly higher wound healing rate in the NPWT+HBOT group compared to the NPWT-only group (11.81 % vs. 8.54 % on day 3, 15.35 % vs. 11.17 % on day 6, 16.44 % vs. 12.14 % on day 9, 20.15 % vs. 14.9 % on day 12; Conclusion: Combining NPWT and HBOT significantly improves the rate of wound healing compared to NPWT alone in chronic wounds, with no significant differences in pain or infection rates between the two treatment groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.