ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2025
Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant radiotherapy for centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching study based on two prospective phase II trials.
Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A contrast‑enhanced CT histogram‑driven nomogram for predicting post‑radiotherapy liver regeneration in hepatocellular carcinoma.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The prognosis of centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma (cl-HCC) was unsatisfactory when treated with surgery alone. Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and neoadjuvant radiotherapy have been reported to correlate with better disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in cl-HCC. Objectives: To compare the survival outcomes and safety of neoadjuvant intensity-modulated radiotherapy (Neo-IMRT) plus surgery with surgery plus adjuvant IMRT (Adj-IMRT) in patients with cl-HCC. Design: This was a retrospective cohort study. Methods: Data from previous prospective studies were analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline characteristics between the Neo-IMRT group and the Adj-IMRT group. Results: Before PSM, the Neo-IMRT group had a higher proportion of larger tumor size (>5 cm), multiple nodes, and higher α-fetoprotein levels than the Adj-IMRT group (all Conclusion: Neo-IMRT plus surgery was as effective and safe as surgery plus Adj-IMRT for patients with cl-HCC. Further prospective trials are warranted to confirm the findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.