ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2025
Combined optical-electromechanical wearable sensors for cardiac health monitoring.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: Integrating multiple biosensors improves the sensitivity and precision of physiological measurements in healthcare monitoring. By combining sensors that target different physiological parameters, a more comprehensive assessment of a subject's health can be achieved. Aim: We evaluate the performance of two biosensors for extracting cardiac parameters: a textile-based strain sensor for measuring respiratory rate and an optical sensor for measuring heart rate, Approach: Two experimental setups were tested. In the first, the strain sensor was placed on the subject's shirt, while the optical sensor was positioned on the external wrist. In the second, both sensors were placed on the chest, under the shirt. The accuracy and performance of each sensor were analyzed in both configurations. Results: The optical sensor demonstrated improved accuracy when placed on the chest compared to the wrist, whereas the strain sensor provided similar results for both configurations. Conclusions: We demonstrate that sensor placement significantly affects measurement quality, emphasizing the importance of optimizing placement when integrating multiple biosensors. Future work will focus on developing a unified wearable system that leverages the strengths of both sensors for comprehensive physiological monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.