ArticleOphthalmology science
Regional Variation in Guttae Distribution in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate regional variations in guttae distribution in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) and evaluate its relationship with anatomical ultraviolet (UV) protection by the eyelid. Design: A prospective observational study. Participants: This study involved 19 eyes of 19 patients with FECD between April 2022 and June 2024 at Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine. Methods: Using slit-scanning wide-field contact specular microscopy, we analyzed guttae distribution in 5 corneal regions (central, superior, temporal, nasal, and inferior). Marginal reflex distance (MRD) was measured to assess the eyelid position. Proportion of guttae was quantified using image analysis. Main Outcome Measures: Regional differences in guttae distribution and correlation with MRD measurements. Results: The superior region demonstrated a significantly lower proportion of guttae (29.4%) compared with central (69.0%), temporal (57.4%), and nasal areas (57.5%) (all Conclusions: Our study reveals a distinct regional variation in FECD progression, with relative sparing of the superior cornea suggesting potential UV-protective mechanisms. Although not directly correlated with eyelid position, these findings indicate that environmental factors may influence disease progression. This insight suggests the potential benefit of UV protection as a preventive strategy, particularly in early-stage FECD patients. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.