ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2025
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in the Era of Large Language Models: Applying an XAI Framework in Pediatric Ophthalmology Diagnosis using the Gemini Model.
Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Image-Quality-Aware Multimodal Artificial Intelligence for Automated Structured OCT Report Generation in Glaucoma Evaluation.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Digital technologies in enhancing hierarchical vision health management for the next 1000 days of children's life: multi-component economic evaluation.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025Article
- Glaucoma Detection and Structured OCT Report Generation via a Fine-tuned Multimodal Large Language Model.ArXiv · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Amblyopia is a neurodevelopmental disorder affecting children's visual acuity, requiring early diagnosis for effective treatment. Traditional diagnostic methods rely on subjective evaluations of eye tracking recordings from high fidelity eye tracking instruments performed by specialized pediatric ophthalmologists, often unavailable in rural, low resource clinics. As such, there is an urgent need to develop a scalable, low cost, high accuracy approach to automatically analyze eye tracking recordings. Large Language Models (LLM) show promise in accurate detection of amblyopia; our prior work has shown that the Google Gemini model, guided by expert ophthalmologists, can detect control and amblyopic subjects from eye tracking recordings. However, there is a clear need to address the issues of transparency and trust in medical applications of LLMs. To bolster the reliability and interpretability of LLM analysis of eye tracking records, we developed a Feature Guided Interprative Prompting (FGIP) framework focused on critical clinical features. Using the Google Gemini model, we classify high-fidelity eye-tracking data to detect amblyopia in children and apply the Quantus framework to evaluate the classification results across key metrics (faithfulness, robustness, localization, and complexity). These metrics provide a quantitative basis for understanding the model's decision-making process. This work presents the first implementation of an Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) framework to systematically characterize the results generated by the Gemini model using high-fidelity eye-tracking data to detect amblyopia in children. Results demonstrated that the model accurately classified control and amblyopic subjects, including those with nystagmus while maintaining transparency and clinical alignment. The results of this study support the development of a scalable and interpretable clinical decision support (CDS) tool using LLMs that has the potential to enhance the trustworthiness of AI applications.
Identifiers
40502262PMC12150742What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.