ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2025
Enhancing Healthcare Data Integration: A Machine Learning Approach to Harmonizing Laboratory Labels.
Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fundamentals of big data and artificial intelligence in transfusion medicine.Vox sanguinis · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Variations in laboratory test names across healthcare systems-stemming from inconsistent terminologies, abbreviations, misspellings, and assay vendors-pose significant challenges to the integration and analysis of clinical data. These discrepancies hinder interoperability and complicate efforts to extract meaningful insights for both clinical research and patient care. In this study, we propose a machine learning-driven solution, enhanced by natural language processing techniques, to standardize lab test names. By employing feature extraction methods that analyze both string similarity and the distributional properties of test results, we improve the harmonization of test names, resulting in a more robust dataset. Our model achieves a 99% accuracy rate in matching lab names, showcasing the potential of AI-driven approaches in resolving long-standing standardization challenges. Importantly, this method enhances the reliability and consistency of clinical data, which is crucial for ensuring accurate results in large-scale clinical studies and improving the overall efficiency of informatics-based research and diagnostics.
Identifiers
40502251PMC12150698What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.