Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40502209›Full record

ArticleAJPM focus2025

From Screening to Support: Exploring Patient Engagement With Health-Related Social Needs Services.

Brenda L Luther, Sara G Bybee, Catherine E Elmore, Ernest Grigorian, Ching-Yu Wang, Jorie M Butler, Andrea S Wallace

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJPM focus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Assessing Unmet Social Needs in Multiple Sclerosis Care in Australia: A Qualitative Assessment of Feasibility, Barriers and Enablers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brenda L LutherCollege of Nursing, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Sara G BybeeCollege of Nursing, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Catherine E ElmoreCollege of Nursing, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Ernest GrigorianCollege of Nursing, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Ching-Yu WangCollege of Nursing, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Jorie M ButlerSchool of Medicine, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Andrea S WallaceCollege of Nursing, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Funding

CTSA UM1 Program at University of UtahUM1TR004409 · NCATS · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI RACHEL HESS, Jennifer Juhl Majersik · 2023 to 2026
$21.9M
Intensifying Community Referrals for Health: The SINCERE Intervention to Address COVID-19 Health DisparitiesR01NR019944 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI WALLACE, ANDREA SCHNEIDER · 2021 to 2024
$2.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004409NINR NIH HHS R01 NR019944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Achieving health equity necessitates addressing social determinants of health. Value-based payment models encourage healthcare systems to address patients' health-related social needs such as housing, food, and transportation. Leading organizations advocate for integrating social needs screening in clinical care to connect patients with necessary services. This study aimed to explore patients' experiences and motivations for completing social needs screening during clinical visits and engaging with community service navigators. The goal is to inform more effective health system strategies for addressing social needs and ultimately enhance population health. Methods: This is a qualitative descriptive study involving clinical visits to adult or pediatric emergency departments or mobile clinics and COVID-19 testing sites within a large tertiary academic healthcare system in the intermountain U.S. Sixty-three patients (30 Spanish speaking and 33 English speaking) who screened positive for social needs were involved. Telephone interviews were conducted with participants who screened positive for social needs and who were referred to service navigators for community resources. Data were analyzed using NVIVO software, identifying key themes through open coding and consensus among content experts. Results: The results revealed that social needs screening facilitated the development of meaningful relationships, making patients feel cared for and supported. Patients initially had low expectations but were often pleasantly surprised and relieved by the resources provided. Although some patients successfully obtained the necessary resources, these sentiments were balanced by others who experienced discomfort or suspicion regarding the screening process. In addition, some patients encountered barriers such as ineligibility, technological challenges, and emotional burdens, which led to frustration and discouragement. Conclusions: Effective health-related social needs screening and referral processes can foster positive patient relationships and address significant social needs. However, the manner of screening and the support provided for navigating resources are crucial. Enhanced support systems are essential to overcome referral barriers and ensure that patients can access necessary services, contributing to improved health equity and reduced disparities.

Indexed as

Community health serviceshealth-related social needspatient experiencescreeningsocial supportvalue-based care

Identifiers

PMID40502209
PMCPMC12155595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.