ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
An improved model for prediction of de novo designed proteins with diverse geometries.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nature uses structural variations on protein folds to fine-tune the geometries of proteins for diverse functions, yet deep learning-based de novo protein design methods generate highly regular, idealized protein fold geometries that fail to capture natural diversity. Here, using physics-based design methods, we generated and experimentally validated a dataset of 5,996 stable, de novo designed proteins with diverse non-ideal geometries. We show that deep learning-based structure prediction methods applied to this set have a systematic bias towards idealized geometries. To address this problem, we present a fine-tuned version of Alphafold2 that is capable of recapitulating geometric diversity and generalizes to a new dataset of thousands of geometrically diverse de novo proteins from 5 fold families unseen in fine-tuning. Our results suggest that current deep learning-based structure prediction methods do not capture some of the physics that underlie the specific conformational preferences of proteins designed de novo and observed in nature. Ultimately, approaches such as ours and further informative datasets should lead to improved models that reflect more of the physical principles of atomic packing and hydrogen bonding interactions and enable improved generalization to more challenging design problems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.