ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
How memory and adaptation cost shape cell phenotypic dynamics in response to fluctuating environments.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cells invariably encounter unpredictable changes in their microenvironment and undergo adaptation by orchestrating considerable alterations in their molecular states that often result in appreciable phenotypic changes. The timescale of molecular and, therefore, cellular adaptation depends on how quickly the memory of past environmental encounters is lost (and therefore forgotten) by the cell (e.g., degradation rate of proteins unfavorable to the current environment). Here, we study the dynamical implications of two distinct memory mechanisms on cellular responses to a changing environment. The two phenomenological models considered are - 1) Undated memory, wherein each prior environmental exposure has an equal probability to dissipate in the next time step, and 2) Dated memory, wherein each experience is dated and erased according to its order of encounter. We observed that while dated memory leads to faster adaptation in single-step environmental perturbations and helps in quick recovery of cellular benefit, the optimal memory type in the periodic environment depends on the period and cell memory capacity. However, both memory types confer comparable cellular benefits in stochastic environments. We extend the results with these memory types to show how the cost incurred during cellular adaptation (e.g., energetic cost of mRNA and protein production) improves cellular decision-making by delaying the phenotypic response until enough environmental change is experienced by the cells. However, such delayed adaptation proves detrimental to the cells under one-step environmental perturbations. Together, these results elucidate the intricate roles of memory and adaptation cost in phenotypic adaptation in fluctuating environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.