ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Pangenome-aware DeepVariant.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Population-scale genomics information provides valuable prior knowledge for various genomic analyses, especially variant calling. A notable example of such application is the human pangenome reference released by the Human Pangenome Reference Consortium, which has been shown to improve read mapping and structural variant genotyping. In this work, we introduce pangenome-aware DeepVariant, a variant caller that uses a pangenome reference alongside sample-specific read alignments. It generates pileup images of both reads and pangenome haplotypes near potential variants and uses a Convolutional Neural Network to infer genotypes. This approach allows directly using a pangenome for distinguishing true variant signals from sequencing or alignment noise. We assessed its performance on various short-read sequencing platforms and read mappers. Across all settings, pangenome-aware DeepVariant outperformed the linear-reference-based DeepVariant, reducing errors by up to 25.5%. We also show that Element reads with pangenome-aware DeepVariant can achieve 23.6% more accurate variant calling performance compared to existing methods.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.