Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40501857›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

The Cerebellum and Striatum in Reward Processing: Caring About Being Right vs. Caring About Reward.

Haroon Popal, Megan Quarmley, David V Smith, Johanna Jarcho, Ingrid R Olson

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Haroon PopalUniversity of Maryland, Department of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0002-4508-5218
Megan QuarmleyTemple University, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2115-2196
David V SmithTemple University, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Johanna JarchoTemple University, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ingrid R OlsonTemple University, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8947-6432

Funding

Mapping the Development of Episodic Memory Diversity SupplementR01HD099165 · NICHD · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI Nora Stefanie Newcombe, Ingrid R Olson · 2020 to 2026
$3.2M
Neural mechanisms of memory bias in adolescent social anxiety persistence and remittanceR01MH132727 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI JOHANNA MOLLY JARCHO · 2024 to 2026
$2.1M
Neural mechanism of reward processing in autistic adolescentsR21MH137759 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI JARCHO, JOHANNA MOLLY · 2024 to 2025
$441k
Pinpointing the Cerebellum's Contribution to Social Reward ProcessingF99NS129182 · NINDS · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI POPAL, HAROON SKANDER · 2022 to 2022
$33k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD099165NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH132727NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH137759NINDS NIH HHS F99 NS129182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging evidence indicates the cerebellum contributes to cognitive functions including social reward processing, yet its specific role relative to established reward regions like the ventral striatum remains undefined. We hypothesized the cerebellum would respond equivalently to both positive and negative social rewards. This prediction is grounded in classical findings that the cerebellum operates via supervised learning mechanisms that rely on error signals rather than traditional reward-based reinforcement. Using fMRI, we examined adolescents and young adults during a social prediction task where participants forecasted others' opinions of them and received accuracy feedback. Findings reveal that both the ventral striatum and a subregion of the posterior cerebellum (Crus I and II) were sensitive to social rewards. However, unlike the ventral striatum, the cerebellum exhibited a more uniform response to feedback, treating correct predictions about being liked and disliked in a similar manner. No age-related differences were observed. These findings suggest the cerebellum processes social rewards distinctly from the ventral striatum, likely reflecting its computational emphasis on prediction errors rather than reward valence. This functional distinction advances our understanding of cerebellar contributions to social cognition and learning mechanisms.

Indexed as

cerebellumrewardsocialstriatumsubcortical

Identifiers

PMID40501857
PMCPMC12157502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.