Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40501846›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

scMetaIntegrator: a meta-analysis approach to paired single-cell differential expression analysis.

Kalani Ratnasiri, Sara N Mach, Catherine A Blish, Purvesh Khatri

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kalani RatnasiriStanford Immunology Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5953-0004
Sara N MachDepartment of Biology, Seattle Pacific University, Seattle, WA, 98119 USA.
Catherine A BlishStanford Immunology Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Purvesh KhatriStanford Immunology Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4143-4708

Funding

Using a tonsil organoid system to probe conditions for the induction of protective antibody and T cell responses to influenza.U19AI057229 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Mark Morris Davis · 2003 to 2026
$88.5M
Systems biological assessment of T cell responses to vaccinationU19AI167903 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BALI PULENDRAN · 2022 to 2026
$13.2M
Targeting natural killer cells to HIV in intravenous drug usersDP1DA046089 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BLISH, CATHERINE A · 2018 to 2022
$3.9M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI057229NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI167903NIDA NIH HHS DP1 DA046089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional differential gene expression methods are limited for analysis of single cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) studies that use paired repeated measures and matched cohort designs. Many existing approaches consider cells as independent samples, leading to high false positive rates while ignoring inherent sampling structures. Although pseudobulk methods address this, they ignore intra-sample expression variability and have higher false negatives rates. We propose a novel meta-analysis approach that accounts for biological replicates and cell variability in paired scRNA-seq data. Using both real and synthetic datasets, we show that our method, single-cell MetaIntegrator (https://github.com/Khatri-Lab/scMetaIntegrator), provides robust effect size estimates and reproducible p-values.

Indexed as

bioinformaticsdifferential gene expressionmeta-analysisscRNA-seqsingle-cell

Identifiers

PMID40501846
PMCPMC12157664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.