ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Motor impairment and adaptation in a novel non-human primate model of internal capsule infarct.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Loss of distal hand and finger control is among the most disabling consequences of stroke. Functional outcomes are typically worse when infarcts involve subcortical white matter tracts, particularly the internal capsule, yet most preclinical stroke models target cortical regions. To address this gap, we developed a non-human primate model of internal capsule infarct using stereotactically guided endothelin-1 injections to disrupt descending fibers from the primary motor cortex hand area. Serial structural and diffusion MRI, along with histology, confirmed subcortical infarcts centered on the targeted white matter region with no apparent cortical involvement. Motor function was assessed pre- and post-infarct using a joystick-based center-out task (proximal forelimb control) and a Klüver board task (distal forelimb control). Animals exhibited variable impairments in proximal function and consistent post-infarct deficits in distal function, including reduced contralesional hand use, longer retrieval time, and increased in-well digit flexions. One animal showed mild post-infarct impairment and the smallest lesion, highlighting that this model reflects inter-individual differences in infarct size and functional outcome as seen in human subcortical stroke. In contrast, the other two animals developed a compensatory wrist-extended posture on the Klüver board task by 4 weeks post-infarct, which stabilized the hand and enabled improved digit flexion. Incorporating this behavioral adaptation into statistical models improved prediction of motor performance. The observed adaptation may have drawn on spared corticospinal output pathways, allowing animals to re-engage pre-existing motor routines to perform the retrieval. While future studies may benefit from ethologically relevant tasks to further elucidate such adaptations, findings from this study recapitulate key features of human subcortical stroke, including persistent distal motor deficits and emergence of adaptive motor strategies. By combining precise lesioning, longitudinal imaging, and detailed behavioral analysis, this model provides a translationally oriented platform for studying white matter stroke mechanisms and evaluating interventions that promote functional recovery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.