ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Evaluating First-Pass, High Protein Capacity Desalting Techniques For Phosphoproteomics Applications.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many commercial desalting products exist for pre-MS peptide cleanup, although few exist that can handle the high protein input (≥ 4 mg) required for phosphotyrosine enrichment. For these desalting products, the technical aptitude required for effective and organized desalting is often a barrier to entry for new users. Here, we evaluate four commercially available desalting techniques with varying degrees of automation, operational organization, and chemistries to determine the most cost-effective, user-friendly, and sensitive technique for protein profiling and phosphotyrosine (pY) enrichment. We find that TECAN Narrow Bore Extraction (NBE) products are the most cost effective per sample and least difficult to use, whereas ProtiFi's S-Trap are the most expensive per sample and Pierce C18 spin columns have the worst operational organization. ProtiFi S-Trap vastly outperforms other desalting methods for peptide sequencing and protein profiling applications, uniquely identifying 25,654 unique peptide sequences and 375 unique proteins. Consistently, ProtiFi S-Trap samples show the deepest pY sequencing after Src SH2 superbinder enrichment, leading to the highest identification of significantly changing, biologically relevant pY sites in a Jurkat T cell signalling model. Our data show that ProtiFi S-Trap columns provide high peptide recovery, thus increasing meaningful pY site identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.