Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40501687›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Optimized feature gains explain and predict successes and failures of human selective listening.

Ian M Griffith, R Preston Hess, Josh H McDermott

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ian M GriffithDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
R Preston HessDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Josh H McDermottDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3965-2503

Funding

Computational Cognitive Neuroscience of Human Auditory CortexR01DC017970 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MCDERMOTT, JOSH H · 2019 to 2023
$1.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention facilitates communication by enabling selective listening to sound sources of interest. However, little is known about why attentional selection succeeds in some conditions but fails in others. While neurophysiology implicates multiplicative feature gains in selective attention, it is unclear whether such gains can explain real-world attention-driven behavior. To investigate these issues, we optimized an artificial neural network with stimulus-computable, feature-based gains to recognize a cued talker's speech from binaural audio in "cocktail party" scenarios. Though not trained to mimic humans, the model matched human performance across diverse real-world conditions, exhibiting selection based both on voice qualities and spatial location. It also predicted novel attentional effects that we confirmed in human experiments, and exhibited signatures of "late selection" like those seen in human auditory cortex. The results suggest that human-like attentional strategies naturally arise from optimization of feature gains for selective listening, offering a normative account of the mechanisms-and limitations-of auditory attention.

Identifiers

PMID40501687
PMCPMC12154610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.