ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Evolutionary Influences on Local Patterns of Genetic Relatedness.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dimensionality reduction methods, such as Principal Components Analysis (PCA) or Multidimensional Scaling (MDS), when applied to genomic data, help to visualize the relatedness of individuals in lower dimensional space and are ubiquitous in population-genetic studies. These analyses use genome-wide patterns of variation to provide an "average" picture of genetic structure and relatedness. However, evolutionary processes result in different patterns of relationship among samples in local genomic regions as compared to the genome-wide aggregate. Recently, these local patterns of relatedness have been used to identify regions under selection and inverted segments. Here, we propose a unifying method to dissect these local deviations in genetic relatedness. Our method, Local Decomposition and Similarity to All Regions (LODESTAR), uses Procrustes Analysis to assess the similarity between local MDS results computed using pairwise allele sharing distances or a set of user-defined points. Given two sets of points, Procrustes Analysis computes the optimal rotation and scaling that fits one set of points onto the other, while maintaining the relative relationship between points within both sets. We use the Procrustes statistic to measure the similarity between the two sets of points. We show how this method can be used to explore local relatedness patterns that mirror sampling geography or population stratification by performing Procrustes analysis between local relatedness plots and coordinates representing sampling geography or between local relatedness plots and the genome-wide relatedness plot, respectively. In addition, we show how the variance of samples in lower-dimensional space can capture regions lacking population structure and inverted segments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.