Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40501536›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Integrating Alternative Fragmentation Techniques into Standard LC-MS Workflows Using a Single Deep Learning Model Enhances Proteome Coverage.

Nikita Levin, Cemil Can Saylan, Joel Lapin, Yana Demyanenko, Kevin L Yang, John Sidda, Alexey I Nesvizhskii, Mathias Wilhelm, Shabaz Mohammed

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nikita LevinRosalind Franklin Institute, Harwell Campus, OX11 0QX Didcot, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-6969-7350
Cemil Can SaylanComputational Mass Spectrometry, Technical University of Munich, D-85354 Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3534-8352
Joel LapinComputational Mass Spectrometry, Technical University of Munich, D-85354 Freising, Germany.ORCID 0009-0009-5013-238X
Yana DemyanenkoRosalind Franklin Institute, Harwell Campus, OX11 0QX Didcot, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-6628-1912
Kevin L YangGilbert S. Omenn Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
John SiddaRosalind Franklin Institute, Harwell Campus, OX11 0QX Didcot, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-3135-0885
Alexey I NesvizhskiiGilbert S. Omenn Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2806-7819
Mathias WilhelmComputational Mass Spectrometry, Technical University of Munich, D-85354 Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9224-3258
Shabaz MohammedRosalind Franklin Institute, Harwell Campus, OX11 0QX Didcot, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-2640-9560

Funding

COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS FOR MASS SPECTROMETRY-BASED INTERACTOME DATAR01GM094231 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Alexey I Nesvizhskii · 2010 to 2026
$5.4M
University of Michigan Proteogenomics Data Analysis CenterU24CA210967 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHINNAIYAN, ARUL M, DHANASEKARAN, SARAVANA M · 2016 to 2020
$4.1M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA210967NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM094231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We built and characterised a mass spectrometer capable of performing CID (both beam type and resonant type), UVPD, EID and ECD in an automated fashion during an LCMS type experiment. We exploited this ability to generate large datasets through multienzyme deep proteomics experiments for characterisation of these activation techniques. As a further step, motivated by the complexity generated by these dissociation techniques, we developed a single Prosit deep learning model for fragment ion intensity prediction covering all of these techniques. The generated model has been made publicly available and has been utilised in FragPipe within its MSBooster module. Rescoring allowed both data-dependent acquisition (DDA) and data-independent acquisition (DIA) to achieve on average more than 10% increase in protein identifications across all dissociation techniques and enzymatic digestions. We demonstrate that these alternative fragmentation approaches can now be used within standard data analysis pipelines and can produce data competitive to CID in terms of efficiency, but in the cases of EID and UVPD with far richer and more comprehensive spectra.

Identifiers

PMID40501536
PMCPMC12154582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.