ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2025
Strengthening antimicrobial stewardship in public health facilities in Malawi through a participatory epidemiology approach.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Building antimicrobial stewardship capacity through participatory health literacy workshops in Zimbabwe.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Article
- Surgical Site Infections in Mozambique: A Literature Review of Incidence, Antimicrobial Resistance, Risk Factors, and Surveillance Practices.Annals of global health · 2026Review
- Impact of Multidisciplinary-Led Implementation of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Zambia: Findings and Implications.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Implementation, Perceptions, and Barriers in Zambia: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Healthcare Professionals.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Combating antimicrobial resistance in Africa: a strategic roadmap for surveillance, stewardship, and research.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In healthcare settings, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is largely driven by excessive use of antibiotics. Empirical prescription largely remains common due to fragile healthcare systems characterized by lack of appropriate diagnostic services. Despite limited data on the epidemiology and the burden of AMR due to the scarcity of routine microbiology facilities, it is evident that Malawi shares a heavy burden of AMR. Effectively implemented antimicrobial stewardship programmes have demonstrated successes in minimizing inappropriate antibiotic usage, and curbing the burden of AMR. However, there are limited data on how antimicrobial stewardship teams can effectively deliver their roles in hospital settings in resource limited settings, including in Malawi. Methods: Malawi's Antimicrobial Resistance National Coordinating Centre (AMRCC) in collaboration with Clinical Research Education and Management Services (CREAMS) conducted participatory workshops with hospital-based antimicrobial stewardship committees aimed at establishing drivers of resistance and antibiotic overuse in hospitals from the perspective of the committees, and co-design facility-friendly intervention against AMR. The workshops consisted of participatory discussion, sorting and design thinking exercises, utilizing principles of implementation research. All the interviews were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed, revealing key drivers for antibiotic overuse and resistance in hospital settings. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis. Results: Key drivers of AMR included limited antibiotic formulary access, poor cross-sectoral coordination challenges between healthcare, veterinary services, government agencies and private facilities, and culturally specific barriers. The participants recommended regular training for healthcare workers on AMR and infection prevention and control (IPC), widespread dissemination of AMR findings, public awareness, introducing electronic monitoring systems and the enforcement of antibiotic restriction policies as the best measures for improving rational antimicrobial use and controlling the spread of AMR. Conclusions: Our findings underscore the complexity of the drivers for antibiotic overuse and resistance in hospital settings, as well as the need for more participatory approaches in tackling the complex challenge of AMR. The findings also signify the importance of a bottom-up approach in designing a solution for promoting antimicrobial stewardship and controlling resistance in hospital and community settings. Participatory approaches blended with principles of implementation research will help to identify contextual challenges, and help to design solutions that are people-centred, context-specific and largely accepted by all involved stakeholders.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.