ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2025
Lessons learned from approaches in COVID-19 risk Communication and community engagement in Malawi: an exploratory study.
Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Public health messaging and community engagement during COVID-19: a rapid-review from the Greater Mekong Subregion.One health outlook · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDuring public health emergencies like COVID-19, approaches used in Risk Communication and Community Engagement (RCCE) are critical in the process of transmitting and exchanging health information. However, there is generally limited literature on COVID-19 RCCE approaches, particularly their strengths and limitations. The current study seeks to contribute to that literature by exploring approaches that were used in COVID-19 RCCE in Malawi, a sub-Saharan African (SSA) country, and drawing lessons from the response based on experiences of those who implemented it.
methodUsing in-depth interviews with ten key informants and ten project reports from three organizations, data were analysed thematically in MAXQDA 2022.
resultsSignificant themes that emerged revealed COVID-19 RCCE employed use of interpersonal approaches like training, peer education, mHealth and social media; use of community mobilization strategies like engagement meetings and dialogues, loud hearing through mobile vans and whistle stops; behaviour change printed materials; and the mass media. Effectiveness hinged on each method's accessibility, intrinsic qualities, and reach. Implementers also emphasized the value of combining multiple approaches and the challenges posed by COVID-19 restrictions.
conclusionThe study underscores the need to select context-appropriate, accessible RCCE approaches to convey critical information, and contributes to the evidence base for future pandemic responses, especially in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.