Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40501360›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment

Central-boost Ablative Radiation Therapy for Solid Tumors: Study Protocol of a Single-arm, Phase II Trial (CBART).

Lingong Jiang, Yangsen Cao, Xiaolan Yin, Chunshan Yu, Yusheng Ye, Xiaofei Zhu, Huojun Zhang

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lingong JiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Changhai Hospital affiliated to Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yangsen CaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Changhai Hospital affiliated to Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaolan YinCancer Center, Shanghai 411 Hospital, China RongTong Medical Healthcare Group Co. Ltd./411 Hospital, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Chunshan YuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Changhai Hospital affiliated to Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yusheng YeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Changhai Hospital affiliated to Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaofei ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Changhai Hospital affiliated to Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5769-9308
Huojun ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Changhai Hospital affiliated to Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundThough stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been widely used in advanced tumors, ablative doses may not be appropriate in the case of large tumors or those abutting to the gastrointestinal tracts, resulting in unfavorable outcomes. Therefore, partial irradiation with high doses to tumors have been investigated. In order to achieve a larger high dose area within the tumor center, we developed a novel radiation modality, which was central-boost ablative radiation therapy (CBART). It was delivered by SBRT, with a central ablative dose in the tumor and a relatively low margin dose. And we tried to assess the efficacy of CBART for patients with large tumors or tumors adjacent to the gastrointestinal tracts.MethodsIt is a prospective, single-arm, phase II trial. Eligible patients would receive CBART. Gross tumor volume (GTV) was defined as a radiographically evident gross disease. The margin of GTV was shrinked to form central core GTV (cGTV). The volume of cGTV should be 50% of GTV volume. A 2-5 mm margin expansion on GTV formed planning target volume (PTV). While no margin expansion was performed on cGTV. The prescription dose of tumor margin was 30-45Gy/5f, determined by the tumor location and pathological features. While the prescription dose of cGTV was 120%-150% of that of tumor margin. Ninety percent of PTV and cGTV should be covered by the prescription dose. After CBART, sequential systemic therapy, including chemotherapy, targeted therapy or immunotherapy would be given according to pathological types and tumor stages. The primary outcome is one-year local control rate.DiscussionAn ablative dose to the hypoxic tumor center while a relatively low dose to the tumor margin may improve local control in the case of large tumors or those abutting the gastrointestinal tracts. Further investigations are required to assess the clinical benefits of CBART.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedTreatment OutcomeTumor Burdenablative radiotherapycentral boostlarge tumorstereotactic body radiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID40501360
PMCPMC12163299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.