ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment
Central-boost Ablative Radiation Therapy for Solid Tumors: Study Protocol of a Single-arm, Phase II Trial (CBART).
Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundThough stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been widely used in advanced tumors, ablative doses may not be appropriate in the case of large tumors or those abutting to the gastrointestinal tracts, resulting in unfavorable outcomes. Therefore, partial irradiation with high doses to tumors have been investigated. In order to achieve a larger high dose area within the tumor center, we developed a novel radiation modality, which was central-boost ablative radiation therapy (CBART). It was delivered by SBRT, with a central ablative dose in the tumor and a relatively low margin dose. And we tried to assess the efficacy of CBART for patients with large tumors or tumors adjacent to the gastrointestinal tracts.MethodsIt is a prospective, single-arm, phase II trial. Eligible patients would receive CBART. Gross tumor volume (GTV) was defined as a radiographically evident gross disease. The margin of GTV was shrinked to form central core GTV (cGTV). The volume of cGTV should be 50% of GTV volume. A 2-5 mm margin expansion on GTV formed planning target volume (PTV). While no margin expansion was performed on cGTV. The prescription dose of tumor margin was 30-45Gy/5f, determined by the tumor location and pathological features. While the prescription dose of cGTV was 120%-150% of that of tumor margin. Ninety percent of PTV and cGTV should be covered by the prescription dose. After CBART, sequential systemic therapy, including chemotherapy, targeted therapy or immunotherapy would be given according to pathological types and tumor stages. The primary outcome is one-year local control rate.DiscussionAn ablative dose to the hypoxic tumor center while a relatively low dose to the tumor margin may improve local control in the case of large tumors or those abutting the gastrointestinal tracts. Further investigations are required to assess the clinical benefits of CBART.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.