ArticleBJU international2025
Prostate artery EmbolisAtion Safety and efficacY: Preliminary and foLlow-Up urodynamic Studies (P-EASY PLUS).
Article in BJU international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the efficacy of prostate artery embolisation (PAE) in the management of obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) by conducting formal urodynamic studies.
methodsPatients with symptomatic BPH underwent baseline assessments, including urodynamic evaluation, followed by PAE. Follow-up International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS), Quality of Life questionnaire (QoL) scores, prostate volume and urodynamic variables were assessed at a mean follow-up of 18 months.
resultsA total of 105 patients underwent PAE, with average final follow-up at 18 months. Prostate volumes reduced by a mean of 30.6% and significant improvements were identified across all IPSS parameters (total IPPS decreased by 55%; P < 0.001), QoL scores (improved by 65.9%; P < 0.001), maximum urinary flow rate (increased by 5 mL/s; P < 0.001), postvoid residual urine volume (decreased by 24%; P = 0.049), detrusor pressure (decreased from 65.0 to 48.9 cmH
conclusionIn this study, PAE resulted in statistically significant improvements by both subjective and objective measures, including symptom severity, quality of life and urodynamic parameters. Whilst longer-term studies are required, these findings support PAE as a non-surgical option within the treatment algorithm for managing symptomatic, obstructive BPH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.