Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40501318›Full record

SynthesisOTJR : occupation, participation and health2026

Art Group Interventions for Children With Learning Differences: A Systematic Review.

N B Conolly, M Hoosain, G Rautenbach, N A Plastow

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in OTJR : occupation, participation and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

N B ConollyStellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-2333-4321
M HoosainStellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
G RautenbachStellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
N A PlastowStellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a lack of evidence-based practice to support the development of children with learning differences via art group interventions. Consequently, this mixed-methods systematic review synthesized existing international research on the outcomes and feasibility of art group interventions for children (≤18 years old) with learning differences, such as autism spectrum disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and generated a framework to guide occupational therapists using art group interventions. Primary studies with a visual art group intervention, children with a neurodevelopmental disorder(s), and feasibility and/or effectiveness outcomes were included with no limiters being applied. Eight electronic databases were screened and two independent reviewers were involved in article selection. Data heterogeneity prevented the meta-analysis of effectiveness outcomes. Analysis showed art group interventions can reduce "problem behaviors" and improve social interaction, self-expression, well-being, general development, and caregiver attachment for children with learning differences. Guidelines: The AR

Indexed as

Art TherapyAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityAutism Spectrum DisorderLearning DisabilitiesOccupational TherapyPsychotherapy, GroupChildHumansNeurodevelopmental Disorderscreative abilityneurodevelopmental disordersyouth

Identifiers

PMID40501318
PMCPMC13219757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.