ArticleAIDS patient care and STDs2025
"We're Going to Be Here": Providers' Perspectives on Implementing a Revised HIV Care Coordination Program.
Article in AIDS patient care and STDs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient and Service Provider Perspectives of Barriers and Facilitators to HIV Care in North Carolina.AIDS patient care and STDs · 2026Article
- Article
- Transportation, administrative burden, and COVID-19: A structural intersectional analysis of barriers to HIV care among Black sexual minority men living with HIV in the US South.SSM. Qualitative research in health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As HIV outcomes continue to improve, disparities in viral suppression and care engagement persist, exacerbated by socioeconomic inequities, mental health stressors, systemic racism, HIV-related stigma, and other forms of discrimination. HIV care coordination programs address structural and psychosocial barriers to care and treatment, but these interventions must adapt to the evolving circumstances and perspectives of those expected to participate in them to achieve and sustain maximal impact. In 2009, the New York City Department of Health implemented a Ryan White-funded HIV Care Coordination Program (CCP). The CCP has demonstrated effectiveness, particularly among those newly diagnosed with HIV and those out of care or unsuppressed in the prior year. However, implementation challenges prompted a 2018 redesign to increase provider and client engagement. We conducted 30 semi-structured interviews with providers from six agencies delivering the revised CCP to examine barriers and facilitators to implementation. Providers highlighted the revised CCP's flexible, client-centered approach as a strength, allowing for personalized care plans and improved client engagement. Additionally, they emphasized the contributions of driven, committed staff. However, providers noted several barriers associated with the revised model or its implementation context, including increased paperwork burden, unrealistic service expectations, understaffing, and burnout from uncompensated emotional labor. Our findings suggest the value of retaining a client-centered model while streamlining administrative processes, enhancing training and support for providers, and increasing staff-client ratios. Adjustments based on providers' experience with a complex intervention can improve the fit of the intervention to its intended delivery settings and promote sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.