ArticleBritish journal of health psychology2025
Assessing moral injury in health care workers living in secular societies: Introducing the Health care-Moral Injury Scale (HMIS).
Article in British journal of health psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing moral injury in health care workers living in secular societies: Introducing the Health care-Moral Injury Scale (HMIS).British journal of health psychology · 2025Article
- Editorial: Patient and medical staff safety and healthy work environment in the 21st century.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe adverse impact of moral injury on health care workers is well documented, for example during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, currently available measures are unsuitable for assessing moral injury in health care workers living in secular societies such as the United Kingdom. The current study introduces and validates the Health care-Moral Injury Scale (HMIS).
methodThe 10-item HMIS was designed during the COVID-19 pandemic to assess moral injury in health care workers. Between September and October 2020, 858 health care workers completed the scale and other measures. A factor structure was identified by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and correlations were used to test the convergent (burnout, hope, mistrust) and divergent (loneliness) validity of the HMIS. Regression analyses tested the criterion-related validity of the HMIS against measures of depression, anxiety and PTSD. RESULTS AND
conclusionsThe HMIS was found to be a unidimensional scale comprised of three conceptual components. There was evidence of good convergent validity, with a medium-sized correlation between the total moral injury score and burnout. However, correlations were weaker for loss of hope and loss of trust. Moral injury was not significantly associated with loneliness when controlling for mental health difficulties, indicating good divergent validity. Moral injury scores predicted worse severity of depression, anxiety and PTSD, supporting criterion-related validity. Findings suggest that the HMIS is a valid scale that can be used by researchers to assess moral injury specifically in a health care context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.