ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025
Using tropical reef, bird and unrelated sounds for superior transfer learning in marine bioacoustics.
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Twelve quick tips for applying deep learning to animal sounds.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Coral restoration alters reef soundscapes but machine learning and manual analyses suggest different recovery rates.PloS one · 2026Article
- A deep learning pipeline for age prediction from vocalisations of the domestic feline.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Using tropical reef, bird and unrelated sounds for superior transfer learning in marine bioacoustics.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Tuning into nature: the sonic boost transforming tropical biodiversity research.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Impact of transfer learning methods and dataset characteristics on generalization in birdsong classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning has the potential to revolutionize passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) for ecological assessments. However, high annotation and computing costs limit the field's adoption. Generalizable pretrained networks can overcome these costs, but high-quality pretraining requires vast annotated libraries, limiting their current development to data-rich bird taxa. Here, we identify the optimum pretraining strategy for data-deficient domains, using tropical reefs as a representative case study. We assembled ReefSet, an annotated library of 57 000 reef sounds taken across 16 datasets, though still modest in scale compared to annotated bird libraries. We performed multiple pretraining experiments and found that pretraining on a library of bird audio 50 times the size of ReefSet provides notably superior generalizability on held-out reef datasets, with a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.881 (±0.11), compared to pretraining on ReefSet itself or unrelated audio, with a mean AUC-ROC of 0.724 (±0.05) and 0.834 (±0.05), respectively. However, our key findings show that cross-domain mixing, where bird, reef and unrelated audio are combined during pretraining, provides superior transfer learning performance, with an AUC-ROC of 0.933 (±0.02). SurfPerch, our optimum pretrained network, provides a strong foundation for automated analysis of tropical reef and related PAM data with minimal annotation and computing costs.This article is part of the theme issue 'Acoustic monitoring for tropical ecology and conservation'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.