ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2025
Ultra-fast MRI for dementia diagnosis and treatment eligibility: A prospective study.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accelerated 3D MRI for ARIA monitoring in Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Ultra-fast MRI for brain-age prediction in a real-world cognitive disorders clinic.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Ultra-fast MRI for dementia diagnosis and treatment eligibility: A prospective study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial for dementia diagnosis and a pre-requisite for amyloid-lowering therapies in Alzheimer's disease. Despite guidelines, many patients never undergo MRI due to limited scanner availability. Shorter scan times would reduce costs and patient burden. We developed and tested a fast MRI protocol incorporating highly accelerated sequences.
methodsWe compared blinded neuroradiologist assessments of a fast protocol with the standard-of-care protocol in a prospective real-world study. We estimated agreement coefficients to evaluate reliability.
resultsThe fast protocol cut scan times by 63% and showed non-inferior reliability measures for diagnosis, visual scale ratings, and disease-modifying therapy eligibility assessment. Between scan-type, intra-rater reliability for diagnosis was greater than inter-rater reliability on the standard-of-care protocol (ratio of 1.37, 95% confidence interval: 1.21-1.58). DISCUSSION: This study proposed and applied a way of showing non-inferiority of a highly accelerated dementia protocol. Ultra-fast protocols could improve MRI access and patient equity and support the implementation of disease-modifying therapies. HIGHLIGHTS: The fast dementia protocol with four core sequences reduced acquisition time by 63%. The fast scan showed non-inferior reliability for diagnosis and visual ratings. Assessment for disease-modifying therapy eligibility was similar between scan types. Fast protocols may improve access to magnetic resonance imaging and diagnosis in dementia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.