Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40501028›Full record

ReviewLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids2025

Surface and Subsurface Mechanical Testing at the Nanoscale: A Review on Ultrasonic Atomic Force Microscopy.

Chengfu Ma, Feng Zhou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chengfu MaState Key Laboratory of Solid Lubrication, Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6813-1459
Feng ZhouState Key Laboratory of Solid Lubrication, Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7136-9233

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Techniques capable of evaluating the surface and subsurface mechanical properties on the nanoscale are crucial for the advancement of many fields of nanoscience and nanotechnology, including nanomaterials, micro/nano-electronics, and nanobiology. To this end, several techniques combining atomic force microscopy (AFM) and ultrasonic excitation/detection, as we refer them collectively as ultrasonic AFMs, have been developed and have drawn great attention. By mechanically modulating the contact between the AFM tip and the sample surface at ultrasonic frequencies and then analyzing the responses of the AFM cantilever, ultrasonic AFMs show the capabilities of nondestructively measuring the elastic and viscoelastic properties of surfaces on the nanoscale resolution of a few nanometers. Parameters including the elastic modulus and the loss tangent of a broad range of materials from soft polymers (∼0.1 GPa) to hard coatings (>100 GPa) can be quantitatively characterized. In addition, ultrasonic AFMs also show potentials of nondestructively visualizing subsurface nanostructures that are embedded beneath the sample surfaces. Particle inclusions, void defects, adhesion interfaces, nanofillers, and subcellular structures can be revealed with detection depths up to a few micrometers, depending on the characteristics of the specimen and the imaging settings. In this article, we review the research on ultrasonic AFMs by concentrating on the imaging methods, the physics for surface and subsurface mechanical testing, and their applications.

Identifiers

PMID40501028
PMCPMC12199469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.