Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40500980›Full record

ArticleStudies in family planning2025

The State of Person-Centered Measurement for Family Planning Need and Use: A Scoping Review.

Ilene S Speizer, Elizabeth A Sully, Youmna M Hashem, Maame Araba A Oduro

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Studies in family planning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elizabeth A SullyORCID 0000-0002-0736-2237
Youmna M Hashem
Maame Araba A Oduro

Funding

Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standard measures used to assess family planning (FP) program success, including unmet need and demand satisfied, fail to capture women's, men's, couples', and adolescents' own expressed preferences, needs, wants, and desires. Identification is needed of person-centered fertility and FP measures that assess what individuals want, desire, need, and prefer without a researcher-ascribed value of what is the right outcome. This scoping review examines how the concept of person-centeredness has been employed as part of population-based FP measurement. For this review, we defined measures as person-centered if they assess directly a person's preferences, wants, and desires while at the same time assessing if the person can or wants to meet those preferences, wants, and desires. The review finds several studies that use or adapt standard measures of intention to use contraception and unmet need; however, a smaller number develop novel approaches that capture method preferences and satisfaction with methods to better capture individuals' needs, wants, and desires as well as their ability to attain these needs, wants, and desires. Results are used to make recommendations going forward for the design and testing of improved person-centered FP measurement at the global, national, and programmatic levels.

Indexed as

Family Planning ServicesHealth Services Needs and DemandAdolescentContraceptionFemaleHumansMalePatient-Centered Care

Identifiers

PMID40500980
PMCPMC12501745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.