Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40500977›Full record

ArticleExperimental physiology2026

Microelectrode recordings from the human cervical vagus nerve during maximal breath-holds.

Vaughan G Macefield, Anthony R Bain, Matthew I Badour, Marko Kumric, Ivan Drvis, Otto F Barak, Josko Bozic, Zeljko Dujic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vaughan G MacefieldDepartment of Neuroscience, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3325-6566
Anthony R BainFaculty of Human Kinetics, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7910-6921
Matthew I BadourFaculty of Human Kinetics, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada.
Marko KumricDepartment of Pathophysiology, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia.
Ivan DrvisFaculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Otto F BarakDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Josko BozicDepartment of Pathophysiology, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia.
Zeljko DujicDepartment of Integrative Physiology, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia.

Funding

DHAC | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) GTN 2019404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voluntary breath-holds can be sustained for a long time following training, but ultimately, regardless of duration, the asphyxic break-point is reached and the apnoea terminated. The physiological changes occurring during the apnoea include a marked increase in sympathetically-mediated vasoconstriction in non-essential organs, such as skeletal muscle, spleen and kidney, while the brain is protected by a marked increase in perfusion. What is not understood is what happens to cardiac vagal activity. Here, we performed microelectrode recordings from the right cervical vagus nerve in healthy participants [both trained breath-hold divers (n = 10) and untrained controls (n = 10)] during tidal breathing, slow-deep breathing, an inspiratory-capacity apnoea and an end-expiratory apnoea. Using cross-correlation analysis of multi-unit neural activity, we tested the hypothesis that breath-hold divers would have greater cardiac modulation of vagal activity, which primarily reflects the discharge of cardiac afferents, particularly during a maximal apnoea. We showed that there were no differences in cardiac modulation of vagus nerve activity either during tidal breathing or during any of the respiratory manoeuvres, nor was there a difference in cardiac modulation during the static phase of a maximal apnoea or when involuntary breathing movements occurred before reaching the asphyxic break-point. We conclude that changes in vagal sensory inputs from the heart are not responsible for the marked tolerance to asphyxia shown by breath-hold divers.

Indexed as

Breath HoldingVagus NerveAdultApneaDivingFemaleHeartHeart RateHumansMaleMicroelectrodesRespirationYoung Adultapnoeaasphyxiabreath‐holdmicroneurographyvagus nerve

Identifiers

PMID40500977
PMCPMC12857484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.