ArticleExperimental physiology2026
Microelectrode recordings from the human cervical vagus nerve during maximal breath-holds.
Article in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- First in-human microelectrode recordings of vagus nerve activity in heart failure.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- Aquaticity as a Latent Dimension of Aquatic Performance: Conceptual Framework and Application to Breath-Hold Diving.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Article
- Cardiac vagal activity is not a determinant of apnoea tolerance in trained breath-hold divers.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- Microelectrode recordings from the human cervical vagus nerve during maximal breath-holds.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Voluntary breath-holds can be sustained for a long time following training, but ultimately, regardless of duration, the asphyxic break-point is reached and the apnoea terminated. The physiological changes occurring during the apnoea include a marked increase in sympathetically-mediated vasoconstriction in non-essential organs, such as skeletal muscle, spleen and kidney, while the brain is protected by a marked increase in perfusion. What is not understood is what happens to cardiac vagal activity. Here, we performed microelectrode recordings from the right cervical vagus nerve in healthy participants [both trained breath-hold divers (n = 10) and untrained controls (n = 10)] during tidal breathing, slow-deep breathing, an inspiratory-capacity apnoea and an end-expiratory apnoea. Using cross-correlation analysis of multi-unit neural activity, we tested the hypothesis that breath-hold divers would have greater cardiac modulation of vagal activity, which primarily reflects the discharge of cardiac afferents, particularly during a maximal apnoea. We showed that there were no differences in cardiac modulation of vagus nerve activity either during tidal breathing or during any of the respiratory manoeuvres, nor was there a difference in cardiac modulation during the static phase of a maximal apnoea or when involuntary breathing movements occurred before reaching the asphyxic break-point. We conclude that changes in vagal sensory inputs from the heart are not responsible for the marked tolerance to asphyxia shown by breath-hold divers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.