ArticleSmall methods2026
Probing Viscoelasticity of Polymeric Coatings Using Nonlinear Dynamic Atomic Force Microscopy.
Article in Small methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Probing Viscoelasticity of Polymeric Coatings Using Nonlinear Dynamic Atomic Force Microscopy.Small methods · 2026Article
- Acrylic Films in Cosmetics: Decoding the Structural Mechanism of a High-Performing Skin Coating.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
- Advances in nanomechanical property mapping by atomic force microscopy.Nanoscale advances · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) has evolved into a powerful instrument for examining material properties at the nanoscale. However, quantifying viscoelasticity using AFM remains a challenging task, since existing methods face sensitivity issues when it comes to the separation of viscous and elastic material properties. Here, a method is proposed that utilizes the nonlinear dynamic response of the AFM cantilever to effectively disentangle and independently quantify the dissipative and conservative parts of the tip-sample interaction force. Through measurements on one and two component solvent-borne coatings, it is demonstrated that the strength of the nonlinearity of AFM cantilever motion is predominantly determined by the elasticity of the sample, whereas the detuned frequency of the nonlinear resonance is contingent on the viscosity. The sensitivity of the quantified values is discussed by comparing the results to those of established multi-frequency AFM measurements, showing good agreement. These findings underscore the effectiveness of nonlinear dynamic AFM for deciphering viscous and elastic material properties, potentially accelerating the development cycles of polymeric coating materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.