ReviewThe American journal of case reports2025
Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection in a Young Man: A Case Report and Literature Review.
Review in The American journal of case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spontaneous coronary artery dissection is a rare and underdiagnosed cause of acute coronary syndrome, primarily affecting women. The occurrence of spontaneous coronary artery dissection in the context of the absence of traditional atherosclerotic risk factors raises questions about the role of physical exertion or other stressors as potential triggers. Early recognition through clinical assessment and imaging is essential, as the therapeutic approach for spontaneous coronary artery dissection differs significantly from the treatment of traditional atherosclerotic acute coronary syndrome. Conservative management is often preferred for hemodynamically stable patients because interventional procedures have increased prevalence of complications in these patients. CASE REPORT This case report highlights an uncommon presentation of spontaneous coronary artery dissection in a 28-year-old man who presented with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction following physical exertion. The diagnosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection was confirmed via coronary angiography, revealing the classic findings of dissection without significant atherosclerosis. Management was conservative, as the patient was hemodynamically stable, with close monitoring and medical therapy, including antiplatelet agents and beta-blockers. CONCLUSIONS This case challenges the prevailing gender assumptions associated with spontaneous coronary artery dissection and highlights the need for increased awareness of spontaneous coronary artery dissection in males. Additionally, it suggests the potential role of physical stressors in precipitating spontaneous coronary artery dissection. Further research into the pathophysiology of spontaneous coronary artery dissection in different populations is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.