ReviewThyroid research2025
Pregnancy outcome following radioactive iodine therapy for Graves' disease in women of childbearing age: a systematic review.
Review in Thyroid research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveGraves' disease (GD) patients treated with radioactive iodine may face health risks from potential radiation exposure, both for themselves and their offspring. This systematic review aims to comprehensively evaluate the association between prior radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy for GD and subsequent pregnancy outcomes in women of childbearing age.
methodsA search of the bibliographic databases PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science was conducted up to December 2024 to identify relevant studies.
resultsThe final systematic review included 1055 patients from 5 articles, all of which were retrospective cohort studies. Two studies reported the incidence of miscarriage after RAI treatment of 2.3% (3/130) and 22.2% (6/27). One study indicated that the miscarriage rate in the RAI group was not significantly different from that in the control groups, while the other did not provide a statistical comparison between groups. Two studies reported the incidence of neonatal hyperthyroidism (NH) after RAI therapy of 11.3% (5/44) and 5.5% (8/145). Both studies indicated that high levels of serum TRAb during late pregnancy were significantly associated with NH (P < 0.05). One study reported the incidence of postpartum thyrotoxicosis (PT) after RAI therapy of 2.1%. Compared with surgical treatment and ATD treatment, patients with RAI therapy had a significantly lower incidence of PT (P < 0.05).
conclusionBased on the limited evidence from retrospective studies, current data does not demonstrate a statistically significant increase in the risk of miscarriage or postpartum thyrotoxicosis following RAI therapy, compared to ATDs or surgical treatment. Elevated maternal TRAb levels in late pregnancy were strongly associated with neonatal hyperthyroidism. However, the small sample sizes and heterogeneity in study designs preclude definitive conclusions. Further prospective studies are required to establish more comprehensive and reliable conclusions and to evaluate more pregnancy outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.