Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40500746›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2025

Variability of sedation practices in palliative care unit in France: a six units retrospective analysis.

Gary Pommier, Matthieu Frasca, Lydie Chain, Simon Piroddi, Kevin Legueult, Flora Tremellat-Falière, Guillaume Economos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Continuous sedation in adolescent and young adult cancer patients under home-based end-of-life care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gary PommierResearch Department, Cognition-Behabior-Technology Lab, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France. pommier.g@chu-nice.fr.
Matthieu FrascaDepartment of Palliative Medicine, CHU of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, Aquitaine, France.
Lydie ChainDepartement of Palliative Medicine and Supportive Care, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France.
Simon PiroddiDepartment of Palliative Medicine, CHU of Dijon, Dijon, France.
Kevin LegueultDepartment of Public Health, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France.
Flora Tremellat-FalièreDepartement of Palliative Medicine and Supportive Care, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France.
Guillaume EconomosEA 37.38 - Centre d'Innovation en Cancérologie de Lyon (CICLy), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPalliative sedation is the monitored use of medications intended to reduce consciousness to relieve the burden of otherwise intractable suffering. Since 2016, the French Leonetti-Claeys law has granted patients the right to receive continuous deep sedation until death (CDSUD) for some indications. There are relatively few data in the literature assessing sedation practices in palliative care units (PCUs).

methodsThis study aimed to compare sedation practices in six French PCUs, analyzing the frequency, types of sedation (CDSUD vs. proportional sedation), and use of sedative medications during the last 72 h of life. This retrospective study examined the data of patients who died in these units between July and December 2021.

resultsThe results revealed statistically significant variability in sedation practices. The overall prevalence of sedation practices (all types) was 22%. The prevalence for CDSUD was 12%. Some units had much higher or lower rates of sedation, suggesting differences in the interpretation of guidelines and regulations, possibly because of cultural or individual factors within the units. The study also found important variability in the use of sedative medication in terms of molecules and dosage. Midazolam was the most commonly used benzodiazepine but the dosage varied significantly depending on the units.

conclusionsFurther qualitative research is needed to understand the reasons for the observed variability in sedation practices and improve the standardization and clarity of palliative sedation.

Indexed as

Deep SedationPalliative CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFranceHumansHypnotics and SedativesMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesHypnotics and SedativesDeep sedation: hypnotics and sedatives (therapeutic use)Midazolam (therapeutic use)Observational studyPalliative careSedation practice

Identifiers

PMID40500746
PMCPMC12153186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.