ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2025
Application of clinical exome sequencing in sperm donor screening in China.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIn China, genetic testing is conducted by only a small proportion of sperm banks. Traditional sperm donor screening primarily relies on family history to exclude individuals with known genetic diseases. However, this method does not fully address the genetic risks associated with recessive and late-onset dominant disorders. This study aims to conduct genetic testing for sperm donors using high-coverage clinical exome sequencing (CES) to identify disease-causing mutations in voluntarily submitted blood samples.
methodsPeripheral blood samples from sperm donors were collected for clinical exome sequencing (CES), which targeted the coding exons of approximately 5595 clinically relevant disease-causing genes.
resultsAmong the 391 donors, 372 (95.14%) were identified as carriers of at least one pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant, including those related to autosomal recessive, digenic recessive, and complex inheritance patterns. The carrier rate for autosomal dominant and X-linked conditions was 4.86% (19/391). On average, each donor carried 3.53 recessive genetic defects. The most frequent variants were found in UGT1 A, FLG, and GJB2. Six donors with high-frequency SMN1 exon 7-8 deletions were excluded. Ultimately, 45 donors (11.51%) were rejected, resulting in a qualification rate of 88.49%.
conclusionsClinical exome sequencing (CES) of sperm donors identified carriers of genetic conditions and excluded those with a history of dominant genetic disorders. Additionally, joint donor-recipient matching for recessive gene carriers can reduce the risk of congenital defects in offspring conceived through assisted reproduction, ensuring genetic compatibility and preventing unintended transmission of genetic disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.