ReviewTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2025
Generative AI for predictive breeding: hopes and caveats.
Review in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- DESIGN: a framework for generative AI-enabled crop molecular design-driven breeding.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- Generative artificial intelligence in animal genomics for smart agriculture: Applications, challenges, and future prospects.Veterinary and animal science · 2026Review
- Leveraging AI and integrated genomic-enviromic prediction for intelligent sugarcane breeding.Plant communications · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence agents for biological research: a survey.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- AI Agents and Agentic AI in plant breeding: new frontiers, opportunities and challenges.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Quo Vadis translational neuroscience?Translational neuroscience · 2026Review
- Towards smart agriculture: AI-driven prediction of key genes for revolutionizing crop breeding.Planta · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Among the broad area of artificial intelligence (AI), generative AI algorithms have emerged as a revolutionary technology able to produce highly realistic 'synthetic' data, akin to standard simulation but with fewer contraints. The main focus of generative AI has been on phenotypes, but here we argue it can serve as well for generating synthetic environments and genotypes. This data-driven technology may be able to overcome some of the limitations that standard simulations have, such as strong assumptions on the underlying genotype to phenotype map. We discuss key features of popular generative models including autoregressive models, generative adversarial networks, variational autoencoders, diffusion and flow-based models. Several of these methods utilize a latent space, often of lower dimensionality than the raw data, that can help making the models interpretable and can be a link between simulation and generative algorithms. Augmenting data as realistically as possible with genAI can improve inference and predictive performance of genomic prediction models, but symbolic simulation will continue to play a fundamental role in predictive breeding. A hybrid tool that implements both approaches can be extremely powerful to evaluate predictive breeding strategies in silico. One promising direction is to simulate novel genotypes using conventional methods, then apply generative models to produce realistic phenotypes conditional on genotype and environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.