ArticleLasers in medical science2025
Efficacy of a wearable 660 nm red light therapy device in alleviating neck pain and enhancing neck function.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mechanisms and clinical application of photobiomodulation in pain therapy: a mini review.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMt) using red light is an emerging non-invasive treatment modality, increasingly applied for managing neck and shoulder muscle discomfort. This article conducts a pilot study which explores the therapeutic potential of a portable and wearable 660 nm LED PBMt device in chronic neck pain. The pilot study was conducted as a self-controlled volunteer study using a dedicated 660 nm LED PBMt device for the treatment of chronic neck pain. Participants received continuous PBMt for a duration of four weeks. Assessments of neck pain and functionality were conducted using the visual analog scale (VAS), neck disability index (NDI), neck pressure pain threshold, and neck mobility, both at the outset and at two-week intervals post-treatment initiation. Additionally, Pittsburgh Sleep quality index (PSQI) Questionnaire was used to evaluated participants’ sleep quality. After two weeks of PBMt device application, there was a significant reduction in neck pain, improvement in pressure pain threshold, and enhancement in sleep quality. Neck mobility showed improvement following four weeks of continuous use. No adverse symptoms were reported by any participants. The wearable 660 nm LED PBMt device showed potential in alleviating symptoms of chronic neck pain and improving neck function. As a non-invasive, efficient and self-administered treatment option, it provided rapid symptom relief for chronic neck pain sufferers and contributes to an overall enhancement in health quality. However, its relative effectiveness remains to be determined in future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40500538What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.