ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2026
Development of the Mugla Score: an association-based tool for risk stratification in emergency department patients with rhabdomyolysis.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rhabdomyolysis is a potentially life-threatening syndrome characterized by skeletal muscle breakdown and systemic release of intracellular components, often resulting in acute kidney injury or death. Early risk stratification remains challenging in the emergency department (ED) setting due to heterogeneous presentations and unpredictable outcomes. To develop and internally validate the Mugla Score-a pragmatic, association-based tool for predicting adverse outcomes in ED patients with rhabdomyolysis. In this retrospective, single-center cohort study, adult ED patients with serum creatine kinase ≥ 1000 U/L between July 1, 2019, and July 1, 2024, were included. The primary outcome was a composite of renal replacement therapy or 90-day mortality. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors, which were assigned weighted point values. Internal validity was assessed using five-fold cross-validation and 1,000-iteration bootstrap resampling. Among 1031 patients (mean age: 49.0 ± 21.8 years; 75.9% male), 109 (10.6%) experienced the composite outcome. Seven variables were independently associated with adverse events: age ≥ 50 years, platelet count ≤ 170 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.