Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40500488›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2025

Deriving safe limits for N-nitroso-bisoprolol by error-corrected next-generation sequencing (ecNGS) and benchmark dose (BMD) analysis, integrated with QM modeling and CYP-docking analysis.

Stephanie Simon, Jörg Schlingemann, George Johnson, Christian Brenneis, Brunhilde Guessregen, Jakub Kostal, Jessica Dieckhoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Complex versus simpleScience advances · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stephanie SimonMerck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2497-5211
Jörg SchlingemannMerck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. joerg.schlingemann@merckgroup.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4799-1086
George JohnsonSwansea University Medical School, Swansea, SA8PP, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5643-9942
Christian BrenneisMerck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1814-9535
Brunhilde GuessregenMerck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3248-6247
Jakub KostalDOT Consulting LLC, Alexandria, VA, 22314, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9727-0477
Jessica DieckhoffMerck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0009-0009-1908-5351

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

N-nitroso-bisoprolol (NBP) is a nitrosamine drug substance-related impurity (NDSRI) of bisoprolol, which is used to treat cardiac diseases since decades. To investigate the mutagenic potential of NBP, in vitro methods such as Enhanced Ames Test (EAT) and a mammalian cell gene mutation (HPRT) assay were used. To assess the in vivo mutagenicity, a 28-day repeat-dose study was conducted in wild-type NMRI mice, and liver and bone marrow samples were subjected to error-corrected next-generation sequencing (i.e., duplex sequencing) followed by benchmark dose analysis (BMD). NBP did not show mutagenic effects in Ames tests using 10 % and 30 % induced rat or 30 % uninduced hamster S9. However, relevant increases in mutation frequencies were observed in an EAT in the presence of 30 % induced hamster S9 in strains TA100 and TA1535, confirming that the most stringent conditions of the EAT are appropriate to detect the mutagenic activity of weak mutagens, such as NBP. In the HPRT assay conducted in V79 cells, nitroso-diethylamine (NDEA) relevantly induced the mutation frequency, but not NBP. The highly sensitive error-corrected Next-Generation Sequencing (ecNGS) method to detect mutations across the genome represents an appropriate in vivo mutagenicity investigation equally suitable as a TGR assay to assess the mutagenic potential of nitrosamines. A weak induction of mutation frequencies was detected by ecNGS in the liver and the bone marrow of mice. Using BMD analysis, new safe limits were calculated for NBP, which are higher than the published AI of 1.5 µg/person/day. Using the approach to calculate Permissible Daily Exposure (PDE) limits according to ICH Q3C, a lifetime PDE of 400 µg/person/day was derived. Based on the ICH M7 framework for derivation of Acceptable Intake (AI) limits, an AI of 64 µg/person/day was established. Consistent with regulatory emphasis on mechanistic interpretation, in vivo modeling was further supported by in silico calculations. Specifically, the validated Computer-Aided Discovery and RE-design (CADRE) tool was used to predict the potency of NBP and further differentiate its metabolic activity from the anchor nitrosamine NDEA via quantum mechanics (QM) calculations and CYP-binding predictions. Outcomes of this analysis were consistent with in vivo studies, while offering a deeper understanding of the fundamental biochemistry using a physics-led method. The integrated in vivo-in silico investigation provides a data-based determination of safe limits, suggesting that the AI based on structural considerations solely might be over-conservative and should not be capped at the TTC.

Indexed as

Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemMutagensNitroso CompoundsAnimalsBenchmarkingCricetinaeCricetulusDose-Response Relationship, DrugHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHypoxanthine PhosphoribosyltransferaseLiverMaleMiceMolecular Docking SimulationMutagenicity TestsRatsCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemHypoxanthine PhosphoribosyltransferaseMutagensNitroso CompoundsAcceptable intakeAIBenchmark dose analysis (BMD)Beta-blockerCYP dockingDuplex sequencingecNGSIn-silico modelingMutagenicityNDSRINitrosaminesNitroso-bisoprololPDEPermissible (permitted) daily exposurePredictive toxicologyQuantum mechanics

Identifiers

PMID40500488
PMCPMC12454523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.