ArticleSpine deformity2025
Comparing surface topographic range of motion in pediatric patients with Scheuermann kyphosis to healthy controls.
Article in Spine deformity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study compares the range of motion (ROM) in all three planes in patients with Scheuermann kyphosis (SK) to healthy controls using surface topographic (ST) scanning.
methodsSK patients and healthy controls between 11-21 years old were recruited prospectively. Patients underwent ST scanning in maximal forward bend, twist to the right and left, and side-bend to the right and left. Sagittal, axial, and coronal ROM were computed using an automated pathway. An analysis of variance was used to determine significant differences in the ROM (coronal, axial, and sagittal) and asymmetry (coronal and axial) of SK patients versus controls. Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) 22r total, self-image, pain and function, as well as Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) mobility, physical activity and pain interference scores, and HSS Pedi-FABS were collected for all patients.
results23 patients with SK and 98 controls were analyzed. SK group was 78.3% male with BMI of 24.1 kg/m
conclusionsPatients with SK have reduced ROM in all three planes measured by ST, compared to controls. The restriction in motion is accompanied by lower SRS22r pain and total scores, indicating that motion may play an important role in a patient's quality of life. This study is limited by the lack of evaluation of extension when assessing sagittal range of motion, which has previously been documented to be compromised by SK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40500478What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.