ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2025
Patient-reported outcome measures in penile cancer: a narrative review.
Review in International journal of impotence research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Penile cancer is a relatively rare cancer globally. The cancer itself and its surgical excision can have detrimental physical and psychosocial implications on patients. Patients can share assessments of their health and quality of life using patient-reported outcome measures. These questionnaires are associated with more dynamic, patient-centred clinical decision-making, better patient symptom control and reduced need for hospitalisation. There is a drive for increased implementation and digitalisation of patient-reported outcome measures, especially in surgical settings, to allow real-time monitoring and adjustment of patient management. Consequently, this narrative review provides a contemporary exploration of the usage of patient-reported outcome measures in patients with penile cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40500461What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.