ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025
Correlation between physical functioning tests and central sensitization in patients with chronic low back pain.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeChronic low back pain may be related to central sensitization, leading to a worse prognosis for patients. Physical functioning tests allow the evaluation of the patient's daily activity. Thus, this study aims to identify the correlations between central sensitization inventory and physical functioning tests.
methods214 patients clinically diagnosed with chronic low back pain and reporting pain intensity above three in the numerical rate scale were included. All patients concluded the central sensitization inventory. Physical function was evaluated with the six-minute walking test (6MWT), time-up-and-go test (TUG), and one-minute sit-to-stand test (STST). The statistical analysis considered all patients and separated them by sex.
resultsMost patients included were women, with an average age of 50 years and pain intensity considered moderate. The correlations were significant, being inverse for the 6MWT (r= -0.19, p = 0.003) and STST (r= -0.3, p < 0.001) and direct for the TUG (r = 0.20, p = 0.002). Analysing confounding factors, STST, age, pain intensity and duration and expectation have showed to significantly impact on risk of central sensitization.
conclusionThe central sensitization inventory has a weak or very wear correlation with physical functioning tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40500417What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.