Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40500349›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2025

Green sample preparation for anthocyanin extraction from purple corn: analytical evaluation of pressurized liquid and ultrasound-assisted extraction using sustainable solvents.

Jorge A Custodio-Mendoza, Alexandra Rangel Silva, Patryk Pokorski, Havva Aktaş, Marcin A Kurek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jorge A Custodio-MendozaInstitute of Agroecology and Food (IAA), Food and Health Omics, Universidade de Vigo - Campus Auga, As Lagoas s/n, 32004, Ourense, Spain. jorgeantonio.custodio@uvigo.gal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8647-1123
Alexandra Rangel SilvaREQUIMTE/LAQV - Departamento de Química e Bioquímica, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto, 4169-007, Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4793-6899
Patryk PokorskiDepartment of Technique and Food Development, Institute of Human Nutrition Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW), 02-776, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2521-5732
Havva AktaşDepartment of Technique and Food Development, Institute of Human Nutrition Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW), 02-776, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8126-1701
Marcin A KurekDepartment of Technique and Food Development, Institute of Human Nutrition Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS-SGGW), 02-776, Warsaw, Poland. marcin_kurek@sggw.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1544-5251

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents an analytical comparison of two extraction techniques-pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE)-for the recovery of anthocyanins from purple corn using sustainable solvents (o-phosphoric acid, ethanol, and water). Twelve anthocyanins were identified using high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection and tandem mass spectrometry, confirming method specificity and selectivity. Both extraction methods were optimized using multivariate experimental designs and validated following U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidelines for analytical methods in food matrices. The protocols demonstrated excellent linearity (coefficient of determination ≥ 0.9992), low detection limits (0.30-1.70 mg/kg), and high precision and accuracy (relative standard deviation ≤ 5.4%, recoveries between 97.1 and 101.9%) at 50, 100, and 150 mg/kg. To assess their environmental and operational performance, both methods were evaluated using two quantitative tools: AGREEprep, which measures greenness in sample preparation workflows, and the Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI), which evaluates practical applicability. PLE achieved a higher sample throughput and lower detection limits, while UAE minimized waste and required less energy. AGREEprep scores (0.73 for PLE, 0.76 for UAE) and BAGI scores (77.5 for PLE, 72.5 for UAE) confirmed both techniques as sustainable and viable for routine analysis. These results demonstrate that both PLE and UAE provide validated, efficient, and environmentally friendly alternatives for anthocyanin extraction from plant-based matrices. The study contributes to the advancement of green sample preparation and highlights the use of structured assessment tools in optimizing analytical workflows for bioactive compound determination in food analysis.

Indexed as

AnthocyaninsLiquid-Liquid ExtractionZea maysChromatography, High Pressure LiquidGreen Chemistry TechnologyLimit of DetectionReproducibility of ResultsSolventsTandem Mass SpectrometryAnthocyaninsSolventsAnthocyaninsBioactive compoundsFood analysisPLEPurple cornUAE

Identifiers

PMID40500349
PMCPMC12276115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.