ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2025
Green sample preparation for anthocyanin extraction from purple corn: analytical evaluation of pressurized liquid and ultrasound-assisted extraction using sustainable solvents.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anthocyanins from Rosaceae fruits: diversity, bioactivity, and potential as natural colorants.Food chemistry: X · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents an analytical comparison of two extraction techniques-pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE)-for the recovery of anthocyanins from purple corn using sustainable solvents (o-phosphoric acid, ethanol, and water). Twelve anthocyanins were identified using high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection and tandem mass spectrometry, confirming method specificity and selectivity. Both extraction methods were optimized using multivariate experimental designs and validated following U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidelines for analytical methods in food matrices. The protocols demonstrated excellent linearity (coefficient of determination ≥ 0.9992), low detection limits (0.30-1.70 mg/kg), and high precision and accuracy (relative standard deviation ≤ 5.4%, recoveries between 97.1 and 101.9%) at 50, 100, and 150 mg/kg. To assess their environmental and operational performance, both methods were evaluated using two quantitative tools: AGREEprep, which measures greenness in sample preparation workflows, and the Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI), which evaluates practical applicability. PLE achieved a higher sample throughput and lower detection limits, while UAE minimized waste and required less energy. AGREEprep scores (0.73 for PLE, 0.76 for UAE) and BAGI scores (77.5 for PLE, 72.5 for UAE) confirmed both techniques as sustainable and viable for routine analysis. These results demonstrate that both PLE and UAE provide validated, efficient, and environmentally friendly alternatives for anthocyanin extraction from plant-based matrices. The study contributes to the advancement of green sample preparation and highlights the use of structured assessment tools in optimizing analytical workflows for bioactive compound determination in food analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.