Trial reportInternational journal of obesity (2005)2025
Randomized controlled trial of time-restricted eating: secondary analyses of breath acetone.
Trial report in International journal of obesity (2005), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Time-restricted eating and metabolic health: implications for nutritional strategies and weight loss.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies of prolonged fasting produced spectacular weight loss and demonstrated that ketone bodies rise for approximately three weeks before stabilizing as production and utilization rates equilibrate. Although starvation is no longer an accepted obesity treatment, an extended period of fasting is the basis of time-restricted eating which produces metabolic benefits. Nevertheless, the pattern of change in ketone bodies with time-restricted eating has never been investigated. We collected weekly fasting measures of breath acetone from subjects (N = 60) who were on an eight-week, calorie-restricted diet and were randomized to different time-restricted eating windows. Subjects participating in a 14-hour fast, 10-hour eating window (14:10) lost more weight than subjects participating in a 12-hour fast, 12-hour eating window (12:12) as previously reported (Nutr Diabetes 2021; 11(1): 6). Ketone bodies assessed via breath acetone showed an increase for the first three weeks without a significant difference between groups. From weeks four to eight, breath acetone levels were lower in the 14:10 compared to the 12:12 group (between group difference: 5.45 ± 2.1 parts per million, mean ± SE, p = 0.012). We show for the first time that ketone bodies decrease after a period of adaptation to time-restricted eating of a calorie-restricted diet likely from enhanced fat oxidation and ketone utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40500316What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.