ReviewThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025
Striatal Dopamine Actions and Movement: Inferences from Parkinson Disease.
Review in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Dopaminergic Identity of SH-SY5Y Cells Across Differentiation Protocols in Parkinson's Disease Research: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- The Dark Matter of Levodopa Pharmacodynamics.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026Article
- Changes in nucleotide and nucleoside metabolism in zebrafish brain exposed to paraquat and 6-hydroxydopamine.Fish physiology and biochemistry · 2025Article
- Balancing Risk and Reward: Dopamine's Central Role in Economic Decision-Making.Brain sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The nature of motor deficits in Parkinson disease (PD) and aspects of their improvements with ʟ-DOPA replacement therapy (LDRT) offer potential insights into striatal dopamine actions. The defining and most LDRT responsive feature of PD, bradykinesia, is a complex phenomenon exhibiting impairments of both simple and complex limb movements. LDRT significantly remediates the former but not the latter. LDRT pharmacodynamics has two major components, the Short Duration Response (SDR), with a time course of seconds to minutes, and the Long Duration Response (LDR), with a time course of days to weeks. LDRT pharmacodynamics suggests different striatal dopamine actions on different time scales. While many studies used PD subjects to investigate striatal dopamine actions, few take LDRT pharmacodynamics into account. Correlating bradykinesia features and LDRT pharmacodynamics with our present understanding of striatal dopamine actions suggests that LDRT failure to improve complex movement performance reflects loss of phasic dopaminergic signaling. The SDR is likely a result of partially restored tonic/volume striatal dopamine neurotransmission. There is no existing explanation for the LDR. Recent experiments isolating the LDR cast doubt on prior accounts of how LDRT remediates bradykinesia. Interactions between the SDR and LDR may give rise to novel properties. Longer duration effects of striatal dopaminergic signaling need to be incorporated into studies of striatal dopamine actions in both preclinical and clinical experiments. Careful studies of PD bradykinesia and LDRT pharmacodynamics offer potential avenues for future explorations of striatal dopamine actions. Systematic preclinical experiments are needed to optimize design of clinical experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.