ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2025
Technical evaluation of immediate back-to-back rest-stress positron emission tomography scanning with
Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMETHODS AND
resultsRetrospectively obtained separate-scan dynamic rest and pharmacologic stress flurpiridaz images in 11 subjects were digitally shifted and combined to model a 15 minute rest/stress procedure with rest scan from 0 to 8 minutes and stress scan from 8 to 15 minutes, providing a paired-sample study design. The modeling of residual tracer effects included both distributed activity and stress effects upon residual arterial input. Residual activity biased mean stress pixel values and myocardial blood flow (MBF) by +31% and +64%, respectively, as compared with the reference stress images without residual activity. These biases were each reduced to less than 1% after residual activity correction. Linear regression analysis found that corrected stress pixel values (r = .998) and MBF (r = .994) closely matched reference stress values, both being equivalent to separate-scan values to less than half of test-retest variability (P < .001). Summed stress scores averaged 2.5 points lower for uncorrected images versus the reference images, and averaged .4 points lower after correction.
conclusionsWithin the study limitations, these results demonstrate that rest and stress flurpiridaz PET images can be obtained immediately back-to-back without rest-stress delay when accurate correction for residual activity is performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.