ArticlePhysiology & behavior2025
The contributions of taste cues to ethanol responses in female and male rats.
Article in Physiology & behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bitter-tasting stimuli, like ethanol (EtOH), are innately avoided yet variability in orosensory-driven behaviors may contribute to differences in ethanol intake. Experiment 1 was designed to test the hypothesis that there are sex differences in the taste qualities of ethanol. Female and male rats were presented 5 or 10 % EtOH followed by administration (i.p.) of LiCl to induce visceral malaise, or saline as a control. Generalization of the conditioned avoidance was assessed in a brief-access taste test (10-s trials; 30-min session) in which water, 0.03 and 0.3 M sucrose ("sweet"), 0.03 and 0.3 mM quinine ("bitter") and sucrose-quinine mixtures were presented in randomized blocks without replacement. Conditioned avoidance of ethanol generalized to sucrose and sucrose-quinine mixtures. In experiment 2, unconditioned lick responses to an array of ethanol concentrations (1-32 %) were measured in rats following administration (i.p.) of saline, 0.1 or 1.0 mg/kg naltrexone, an opioid receptor antagonist. Compared to saline, naltrexone administration lowered trials initiated for both sexes, but decreased responses to 32 % ethanol only for males. Together these findings indicate the oral qualitative profile of ethanol is comparable and the sucrose-like component is most salient in both sexes. Opioidergic signaling that drives the appetitive components of behavior towards ethanol is similar for females and males but differs for some components of consummatory behavior. Thus, sex differences in responses to ethanol do not appear to be primarily driven by variability in qualitative components of ethanol that contributes to consummatory aspects of ingestive behavior, but more likely by reward-related signaling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.